Google Veo 3.1 Lite
7.2/10Editorial score
Higher-rated areas: Speed & reliability, Audio & lip sync
Compare engines
Google Veo 3.1 Lite vs Wan 2.6 Text & Image to Video
See what each model can create. Compare quality, controls and price.
How to choose
Compare Google Veo 3.1 Lite and Wan 2.6 Text & Image to Video by key specs, pricing, controls, and a scorecard across 10 criteria.
Wan 2.6 Text & Image to Video
6.2/10Editorial score
Higher-rated areas: Speed & reliability, Creative control
See the models in action
Independent examples, with different prompts and settings.
Google Veo 3.1 Lite
No published video for this model yet. Explore the available examples.
Explore examplesWan 2.6 Text & Image to Video
No published video for this model yet. Explore the available examples.
Explore examplesCompare what matters
These are MaxVideoAI editorial assessments, not same-prompt test results. The dates below record score updates. MaxVideoAI sells access to the models it covers.
Score records last updated: Google Veo 3.1 Lite · Wan 2.6 Text & Image to Video
How we benchmark| Criterion · 0–10 | Google Veo 3.1 Lite | Wan 2.6 Text & Image to Video |
|---|---|---|
| Follows your promptHow closely the result follows the prompt. | Google Veo 3.1 Lite7.8/10 | Wan 2.6 Text & Image to Video6.2/10 |
| Visual qualityDetail, lighting and visible artifacts. | Google Veo 3.1 Lite6.7/10 | Wan 2.6 Text & Image to Video5.2/10 |
| Natural movementHow naturally subjects and cameras move. | Google Veo 3.1 Lite7.2/10 | Wan 2.6 Text & Image to Video6.2/10 |
| Human appearanceFaces, hands and body movement. | Google Veo 3.1 Lite7.3/10 | Wan 2.6 Text & Image to Video5.8/10 |
| Audio & lip syncSpeech, sound and mouth movement in sync. | Google Veo 3.1 Lite8.1/10 | Wan 2.6 Text & Image to Video4.0/10 |
| Creative controlHow much direction the model follows. | Google Veo 3.1 Lite7.5/10 | Wan 2.6 Text & Image to Video6.5/10 |
6 of 10 criteria shown10 of 10 criteria shownCompare the 4 other criteriaHide additional criteria
| Criterion · 0–10 | Google Veo 3.1 Lite | Wan 2.6 Text & Image to Video |
|---|---|---|
| Consistency over timeWhether details hold together over time. | Google Veo 3.1 Lite6.7/10 | Wan 2.6 Text & Image to Video6.2/10 |
| Readable textHow readable generated text and interfaces are. | Google Veo 3.1 Lite6.1/10 | Wan 2.6 Text & Image to Video4.8/10 |
| Multi-shot continuityContinuity between different shots. | Google Veo 3.1 Lite7.3/10 | Wan 2.6 Text & Image to Video5.8/10 |
| Speed & reliabilityGeneration speed and reliability. | Google Veo 3.1 Lite9.0/10 | Wan 2.6 Text & Image to Video7.5/10 |
Generate with
Google Veo 3.1 Lite
Generate with
Wan 2.6 Text & Image to Video
What will your video cost?
Compare prices by resolution. The final quote depends on your duration, mode and settings.
Google Veo 3.1 Lite
Text to video4 s16:9audio on
- 720p
- $0.24per video · $0.06/s
- 1080p
- $0.39per video · $0.0975/s
Wan 2.6 Text & Image to Video
Text to video5 s16:9audio on
- 720p
- $0.60per video · $0.12/s
- 1080p
- $0.90per video · $0.18/s
Your settings. Your quote. Before you generate.
USD estimate · snapshot generated
Formats, inputs and controls
Check duration, resolution, supported inputs and controls. Open each model’s guide for its full feature set.
New clip · maximum
- Google Veo 3.1 Lite
- 8 s
- Wan 2.6 Text & Image to Video
- 15 s
Max resolution
- Google Veo 3.1 Lite
- 1080p
- Wan 2.6 Text & Image to Video
- Up to 1080p
Audio output
- Google Veo 3.1 Lite
- Supported
- Wan 2.6 Text & Image to Video
- Text/Image modes only; off in Reference mode
Compare all 18 specificationsClose the full specification tableCheck references, audio, camera controls and output formats.
| Key spec | Google Veo 3.1 Lite | Wan 2.6 Text & Image to Video |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing (MaxVideoAI) | 720p: $0.06/s1080p: $0.0975/s | 720p: $0.12/s1080p: $0.18/s |
| Text-to-Video | Supported | Supported |
| Image-to-Video | Supported | Supported |
| Video-to-Video | Supported (Extend from one source video) | Reference-video guidance |
| First/Last frame | Supported (one start image + one last frame) | Not supported |
| Reference image / style reference | Start image only; no multi-reference stills | Supported |
| Reference video | Supported (one source clip for Extend) | Supported |
| Max resolution | 1080p | Up to 1080p |
| New clip · maximum | 8 sText to video, Image to video, First / last frame: 4 / 6 / 8 s | 15 sText to video, Image to video: 5 / 10 / 15 sReferences: 5 / 10 s |
| Extension · added duration | 7 s | Not supported |
| Aspect ratios | 16:9 / 9:16 | 16:9 / 9:16 / 1:1 |
| FPS options | 24 fps | 24 |
| Output format | MP4 | MP4 |
| Audio output | Supported | Text/Image modes only; off in Reference mode |
| Native audio generation | Supported | Not supported |
| Lip sync | Supported | Supported |
| Camera / motion controls | Prompt-based only | Basic |
| Watermark | No (MaxVideoAI) | No (MaxVideoAI) |
Duration choices depend on mode and resolution; check the creation settings.
Capabilities available in MaxVideoAI. Provider sources below; their verification dates are not recorded here.
Google Veo 3.1 Lite: maxvideoai.com · fal.ai (1) · fal.ai (2) · fal.ai (3) · fal.ai (4)
Wan 2.6 Text & Image to Video: maxvideoai.com
11 questions to help you choose
FAQ
Quick answers about Google Veo 3.1 Lite vs Wan 2.6 Text & Image to Video on MaxVideoAI (pricing, modes, specs, and why results differ).
Open a question to read the answer. One answer at a time.
Which is better: Google Veo 3.1 Lite or Wan 2.6 Text & Image to Video?
It depends on your workflow. Use the scorecard and specs to compare control, references, audio, pricing, and generation limits, then open each engine profile for full details.
Which is cheaper on MaxVideoAI?
- Google Veo 3.1 Lite — Text to video · 4 s · 16:9 · audio on; 720p: $0.24 per video ($0.06/s); 1080p: $0.39 per video ($0.0975/s).
- Wan 2.6 Text & Image to Video — Text to video · 5 s · 16:9 · audio on; 720p: $0.60 per video ($0.12/s); 1080p: $0.90 per video ($0.18/s).
- Compare equivalent settings. These are estimates in USD, not reserved quotes.
What are the biggest differences between Google Veo 3.1 Lite and Wan 2.6 Text & Image to Video?
- Reference image / style reference — Google Veo 3.1 Lite: Start image only; no multi-reference stills; Wan 2.6 Text & Image to Video: supported.
- Max resolution: Google Veo 3.1 Lite is 1080p vs Wan 2.6 Text & Image to Video is Up to 1080p.
Can I start from text, an image or a video?
- Google Veo 3.1 Lite — Text-to-Video: Supported; Image-to-Video: Supported; Video-to-Video: Supported (Extend from one source video).
- Wan 2.6 Text & Image to Video — Text-to-Video: Supported; Image-to-Video: Supported; Video-to-Video: Reference-video guidance.
Can I use start and end frames or references?
- Google Veo 3.1 Lite — First/Last frame: Supported (one start image + one last frame); Reference image / style reference: Start image only; no multi-reference stills; Reference video: Supported (one source clip for Extend).
- Wan 2.6 Text & Image to Video — First/Last frame: Not supported; Reference image / style reference: Supported; Reference video: Supported.
What resolutions, durations and aspect ratios are available?
- Google Veo 3.1 Lite — Max resolution: 1080p; New clip · maximum: 8 s. Text to video, Image to video, First / last frame: 4 / 6 / 8 s. Extension · added duration: 7 s. Aspect ratios: 16:9 / 9:16. Duration choices depend on mode and resolution; check the creation settings.
- Wan 2.6 Text & Image to Video — Max resolution: Up to 1080p; New clip · maximum: 15 s. Text to video, Image to video: 5 / 10 / 15 s; References: 5 / 10 s. Extension · added duration: Not supported. Aspect ratios: 16:9 / 9:16 / 1:1. Duration choices depend on mode and resolution; check the creation settings.
Can the models generate audio and lip sync?
- Google Veo 3.1 Lite — Audio output: Supported; Native audio generation: Supported; Lip sync: Supported.
- Wan 2.6 Text & Image to Video — Audio output: Text/Image modes only; off in Reference mode; Native audio generation: Not supported; Lip sync: Supported.
Does MaxVideoAI add a watermark?
- Google Veo 3.1 Lite — Watermark: No (MaxVideoAI).
- Wan 2.6 Text & Image to Video — Watermark: No (MaxVideoAI).
Why can results differ between these models?
Models interpret instructions, visual references, and generation constraints differently.
Where can I find full specs, controls, and more prompt examples?
Open the full engine profiles for complete specs, controls, and more prompts: /models/veo-3-1-lite and /models/wan-2-6. You can also browse more outputs in the engine galleries.
What are Google Veo 3.1 Lite and Wan 2.6 Text & Image to Video?
Google Veo 3.1 Lite and Wan 2.6 Text & Image to Video are AI video generation engines documented on MaxVideoAI. This page compares key specs, pricing, controls, and performance data shown above.