Compare engines

Seedance 2.0 vs Google Veo 3.1 Fast

See what each model can create. Compare quality, controls and price.

How to choose

Compare Seedance 2.0 with Google Veo 3.1 Fast when deciding between a broad 15-second reference and editing workflow or a focused eight-second fast-production route. Both support audio and 4K, but they organize controls and pricing differently.

Quick verdict

Choose Seedance 2.0 for longer, reference-heavy production that may need video editing, extension, motion controls, or broader aspect ratios. Choose Google Veo 3.1 Fast for shorter rapid iterations with first-last-frame control and a simpler resolution-based price ladder.

Choose Seedance for control

Seedance reaches 15 seconds and combines references, video editing, extension, motion controls, audio, and resolutions from 480p through 4K.

Choose Veo Fast for iteration

Veo Fast focuses on rapid eight-second production with audio, references, first and last frames, extension, and up to 4K.

Different pricing systems

Seedance uses dynamic token pricing, while Veo Fast uses a resolution-based per-second ladder, so neither is universally cheaper.

Long edit or fast shot

Seedance fits extended, edited, reference-rich sequences; Veo Fast fits short ads and shots that benefit from predictable resolution choices.

Seedance 2.0

8.5/10Editorial score

Higher-rated areas: Audio & lip sync, Visual quality

Google Veo 3.1 Fast

7.6/10Editorial score

Higher-rated areas: Speed & reliability, Audio & lip sync

Compare what matters

These are MaxVideoAI editorial assessments, not same-prompt test results. The dates below record score updates. MaxVideoAI sells access to the models it covers.

Score records last updated: Seedance 2.0 · Google Veo 3.1 Fast

How we benchmark
Criterion · 0–10Seedance 2.0Google Veo 3.1 Fast
Follows your promptHow closely the result follows the prompt.
Seedance 2.08.6/10
Google Veo 3.1 Fast8.1/10
Visual qualityDetail, lighting and visible artifacts.
Seedance 2.08.8/10
Google Veo 3.1 Fast7.1/10
Natural movementHow naturally subjects and cameras move.
Seedance 2.08.7/10
Google Veo 3.1 Fast7.7/10
Human appearanceFaces, hands and body movement.
Seedance 2.08.4/10
Google Veo 3.1 Fast7.6/10
Audio & lip syncSpeech, sound and mouth movement in sync.
Seedance 2.09.2/10
Google Veo 3.1 Fast8.4/10
Creative controlHow much direction the model follows.
Seedance 2.08.8/10
Google Veo 3.1 Fast7.9/10
6 of 10 criteria shown10 of 10 criteria shownCompare the 4 other criteriaHide additional criteria
Criterion · 0–10Seedance 2.0Google Veo 3.1 Fast
Consistency over timeWhether details hold together over time.
Seedance 2.08.2/10
Google Veo 3.1 Fast7.0/10
Readable textHow readable generated text and interfaces are.
Seedance 2.07.0/10
Google Veo 3.1 Fast6.5/10
Multi-shot continuityContinuity between different shots.
Seedance 2.08.4/10
Google Veo 3.1 Fast7.5/10
Speed & reliabilityGeneration speed and reliability.
Seedance 2.07.4/10
Google Veo 3.1 Fast9.1/10

What will your video cost?

Compare prices by resolution. The final quote depends on your duration, mode and settings.

Seedance 2.0

Text to video4 s16:9audio on
480p
$0.63per video · $0.1575/s
720p
$1.40per video · $0.35/s
1080p
$3.46per video · $0.865/s

Google Veo 3.1 Fast

Text to video4 s16:9audio on
720p
$0.48per video · $0.12/s
1080p
$0.58per video · $0.145/s
4K
$1.44per video · $0.36/s

Your settings. Your quote. Before you generate.
USD estimate · snapshot generated

Formats, inputs and controls

Check duration, resolution, supported inputs and controls. Open each model’s guide for its full feature set.

New clip · maximum

Seedance 2.0
15 s
Google Veo 3.1 Fast
8 s

Max resolution

Seedance 2.0
4K on the standard Dreamina Seedance 2.0 route
Google Veo 3.1 Fast
4K

Audio output

Seedance 2.0
Supported
Google Veo 3.1 Fast
Supported
Compare all 18 specificationsClose the full specification tableCheck references, audio, camera controls and output formats.
Seedance 2.0 / Google Veo 3.1 Fast — Key spec
Key specSeedance 2.0Google Veo 3.1 Fast
Pricing (MaxVideoAI)480p: $0.1575/s720p: $0.35/s1080p: $0.865/s720p: $0.12/s1080p: $0.145/s4K: $0.36/s
Text-to-VideoSupportedSupported
Image-to-VideoSupportedSupported
Video-to-VideoSupported (video edit and extend)Supported (extend / retake workflows)
First/Last frameSupported (1 start image + optional end image in i2v)Supported
Reference image / style referenceRef2V: up to 9 image references; I2V: 1 start imageImage-to-Video: 1 start image; Reference mode: 1-3 stills
Reference videoSupported (up to 3 video references, video edit, or extension clips)Supported (source clip for extend / retake)
Max resolution4K on the standard Dreamina Seedance 2.0 route4K
New clip · maximum15 sText to video, Image to video, Image references: 4–15 s8 sText to video, Image to video, First / last frame: 4 / 6 / 8 sImage references: 8 s
Extension · added duration4 / 5 / 6 / 7 / 8 / 9 / 10 / 11 / 12 / 13 / 14 / 15 s7 s
Aspect ratiosAuto / 21:9 / 16:9 / 4:3 / 1:1 / 3:4 / 9:1616:9 / 9:16
FPS options2424 fps
Output formatMP4MP4
Audio outputSupportedSupported
Native audio generationSupportedSupported
Lip syncSupportedSupported
Camera / motion controlsAdvancedPrompt-based only
WatermarkNo (MaxVideoAI)No (MaxVideoAI)

Duration choices depend on mode and resolution; check the creation settings.

Capabilities available in MaxVideoAI. Provider sources below; their verification dates are not recorded here.

Seedance 2.0: fal.ai (1) · fal.ai (2) · seed.bytedance.com · docs.byteplus.com (1) · docs.byteplus.com (2)

Google Veo 3.1 Fast: maxvideoai.com · fal.ai (1) · fal.ai (2) · fal.ai (3) · fal.ai (4) · fal.ai (5)

Recommended next steps

Continue this comparison in your AI assistant
3 questions to help you choose

FAQ

Answers for choosing a longer controlled workflow or a shorter fast-production route.

Open a question to read the answer. One answer at a time.

Which model supports longer clips, Seedance 2.0 or Veo 3.1 Fast?

Seedance 2.0 reaches 15 seconds, while Google Veo 3.1 Fast reaches eight seconds. Seedance is the stronger fit when shot length is decisive.

Which model offers more video editing controls?

Seedance 2.0 offers video-to-video editing, extension, references, and motion controls. Veo Fast offers references, first-last-frame control, and extension in a faster focused workflow.

Is Seedance 2.0 cheaper than Veo 3.1 Fast?

There is no universal winner: Seedance uses dynamic token pricing, while Veo Fast uses a per-second ladder that changes by resolution and audio choice.