Compare engines

Seedance 2.0 Fast vs Google Veo 3.1

See what each model can create. Compare quality, controls and price.

How to choose

Compare Seedance 2.0 Fast with Google Veo 3.1 when choosing between a broad draft-and-edit workflow and higher-resolution final delivery. Seedance Fast reaches 15 seconds with references, video editing, and extend at 480p or 720p; Veo 3.1 reaches 4K for polished 8-second ads and B-roll.

Quick verdict

Choose Seedance 2.0 Fast for rapid planning, longer drafts, reference-heavy iteration, video edits, or extensions where 720p is enough. Choose Google Veo 3.1 for polished short ads, B-roll, first-and-last-frame control, and final delivery at 1080p or 4K when output resolution matters more than clip length.

Choose Seedance 2.0 Fast

Use Seedance Fast for 4- to 15-second drafts, visual references, video editing, extensions, and flexible aspect ratios.

Choose Veo 3.1

Use Veo for polished 8-second ads or B-roll, first-and-last-frame control, audio, and 1080p or 4K delivery.

Key trade-off

Seedance offers more duration and editing breadth at 480p/720p; Veo offers shorter clips with substantially higher final resolution.

Best workflows

Seedance fits shot planning and iterative edits. Veo fits approved campaign shots, polished product visuals, and high-resolution masters.

Seedance 2.0 Fast

7.8/10Editorial score

Higher-rated areas: Audio & lip sync, Speed & reliability

Google Veo 3.1

7.9/10Editorial score

Higher-rated areas: Audio & lip sync, Follows your prompt

Compare what matters

These are MaxVideoAI editorial assessments, not same-prompt test results. The dates below record score updates. MaxVideoAI sells access to the models it covers.

Score records last updated: Seedance 2.0 Fast · Google Veo 3.1

How we benchmark
Criterion · 0–10Seedance 2.0 FastGoogle Veo 3.1
Follows your promptHow closely the result follows the prompt.
Seedance 2.0 Fast8.0/10
Google Veo 3.18.4/10
Visual qualityDetail, lighting and visible artifacts.
Seedance 2.0 Fast7.8/10
Google Veo 3.18.1/10
Natural movementHow naturally subjects and cameras move.
Seedance 2.0 Fast8.1/10
Google Veo 3.17.9/10
Human appearanceFaces, hands and body movement.
Seedance 2.0 Fast7.8/10
Google Veo 3.18.2/10
Audio & lip syncSpeech, sound and mouth movement in sync.
Seedance 2.0 Fast8.8/10
Google Veo 3.19.0/10
Creative controlHow much direction the model follows.
Seedance 2.0 Fast8.1/10
Google Veo 3.18.3/10
6 of 10 criteria shown10 of 10 criteria shownCompare the 4 other criteriaHide additional criteria
Criterion · 0–10Seedance 2.0 FastGoogle Veo 3.1
Consistency over timeWhether details hold together over time.
Seedance 2.0 Fast7.2/10
Google Veo 3.17.4/10
Readable textHow readable generated text and interfaces are.
Seedance 2.0 Fast6.8/10
Google Veo 3.17.2/10
Multi-shot continuityContinuity between different shots.
Seedance 2.0 Fast7.6/10
Google Veo 3.17.8/10
Speed & reliabilityGeneration speed and reliability.
Seedance 2.0 Fast8.8/10
Google Veo 3.17.4/10

What will your video cost?

Compare prices by resolution. The final quote depends on your duration, mode and settings.

Seedance 2.0 Fast

Text to video4 s16:9audio on
480p
$0.50per video · $0.125/s
720p
$1.12per video · $0.28/s

Google Veo 3.1

Text to video4 s16:9audio on
720p
$1.92per video · $0.48/s
1080p
$1.92per video · $0.48/s
4K
$2.88per video · $0.72/s

Your settings. Your quote. Before you generate.
USD estimate · snapshot generated

Formats, inputs and controls

Check duration, resolution, supported inputs and controls. Open each model’s guide for its full feature set.

New clip · maximum

Seedance 2.0 Fast
15 s
Google Veo 3.1
8 s

Max resolution

Seedance 2.0 Fast
720p
Google Veo 3.1
4K

Audio output

Seedance 2.0 Fast
Supported
Google Veo 3.1
Supported
Compare all 18 specificationsClose the full specification tableCheck references, audio, camera controls and output formats.
Seedance 2.0 Fast / Google Veo 3.1 — Key spec
Key specSeedance 2.0 FastGoogle Veo 3.1
Pricing (MaxVideoAI)480p: $0.125/s720p: $0.28/s720p: $0.48/s1080p: $0.48/s4K: $0.72/s
Text-to-VideoSupportedSupported
Image-to-VideoSupportedSupported
Video-to-VideoSupported (video edit and extend)Supported (Extend from one source video)
First/Last frameSupported (1 start image + optional end image in i2v)Supported
Reference image / style referenceRef2V: up to 9 image references; I2V: 1 start imageImage-to-Video: 1 start image; Reference-to-Video: 1-3 stills
Reference videoSupported (up to 3 video references, video edit, or extension clips)Supported (one source clip for Extend)
Max resolution720p4K
New clip · maximum15 sText to video, Image to video, Image references: 4–15 s8 sText to video, Image to video, First / last frame: 4 / 6 / 8 sImage references: 8 s
Extension · added duration4 / 5 / 6 / 7 / 8 / 9 / 10 / 11 / 12 / 13 / 14 / 15 s7 s
Aspect ratiosAuto / 21:9 / 16:9 / 4:3 / 1:1 / 3:4 / 9:1616:9 / 9:16
FPS options2424 fps
Output formatMP4MP4
Audio outputSupportedSupported
Native audio generationSupportedSupported
Lip syncSupportedSupported
Camera / motion controlsAdvancedPrompt-based only
WatermarkNo (MaxVideoAI)No visible MaxVideoAI watermark; provider/model provenance markers may apply

Duration choices depend on mode and resolution; check the creation settings.

Capabilities available in MaxVideoAI. Provider sources below; their verification dates are not recorded here.

Seedance 2.0 Fast: fal.ai (1) · fal.ai (2)

Google Veo 3.1: maxvideoai.com · fal.ai (1) · fal.ai (2) · fal.ai (3) · fal.ai (4) · fal.ai (5)

Recommended next steps

Continue this comparison in your AI assistant
3 questions to help you choose

FAQ

Short answers for choosing a fast Seedance workflow or final-quality Veo output.

Open a question to read the answer. One answer at a time.

Is Seedance 2.0 Fast or Veo 3.1 better for drafts?

Seedance 2.0 Fast is designed for rapid drafts, reference tests, and shot planning. It also supports clips up to 15 seconds, video editing, and extension at 480p or 720p.

Which model is better for final 4K delivery?

Google Veo 3.1 is the better fit for a polished 4K master. Seedance 2.0 Fast tops out at 720p and is better treated as an iteration and editing route.

Do both models support audio and reference workflows?

Yes. Both support audio and reference-led generation. Seedance adds video-to-video editing and a wider aspect-ratio set, while Veo adds first-and-last-frame control and higher-resolution output.