Pika 2.2 Text & Image to Video
5.4/10Editorial score
Higher-rated areas: Speed & reliability, Creative control
Compare engines
Pika 2.2 Text & Image to Video vs Google Veo 3.1 Fast
See what each model can create. Compare quality, controls and price.
How to choose
Compare Pika 2.2 Text & Image to Video and Google Veo 3.1 Fast by key specs, pricing, controls, and a scorecard across 10 criteria.
Google Veo 3.1 Fast
7.6/10Editorial score
Higher-rated areas: Speed & reliability, Audio & lip sync
See the models in action
Independent examples, with different prompts and settings.
Pika 2.2 Text & Image to Video
No published video for this model yet. Explore the available examples.
Explore examplesGoogle Veo 3.1 Fast
No published video for this model yet. Explore the available examples.
Explore examplesCompare what matters
These are MaxVideoAI editorial assessments, not same-prompt test results. The dates below record score updates. MaxVideoAI sells access to the models it covers.
Score records last updated: Pika 2.2 Text & Image to Video · Google Veo 3.1 Fast
How we benchmark| Criterion · 0–10 | Pika 2.2 Text & Image to Video | Google Veo 3.1 Fast |
|---|---|---|
| Follows your promptHow closely the result follows the prompt. | Pika 2.2 Text & Image to Video5.1/10 | Google Veo 3.1 Fast8.1/10 |
| Visual qualityDetail, lighting and visible artifacts. | Pika 2.2 Text & Image to Video5.3/10 | Google Veo 3.1 Fast7.1/10 |
| Natural movementHow naturally subjects and cameras move. | Pika 2.2 Text & Image to Video5.6/10 | Google Veo 3.1 Fast7.7/10 |
| Human appearanceFaces, hands and body movement. | Pika 2.2 Text & Image to Video5.8/10 | Google Veo 3.1 Fast7.6/10 |
| Audio & lip syncSpeech, sound and mouth movement in sync. | Pika 2.2 Text & Image to VideoN/A | Google Veo 3.1 Fast8.4/10 |
| Creative controlHow much direction the model follows. | Pika 2.2 Text & Image to Video6.0/10 | Google Veo 3.1 Fast7.9/10 |
6 of 10 criteria shown10 of 10 criteria shownCompare the 4 other criteriaHide additional criteria
| Criterion · 0–10 | Pika 2.2 Text & Image to Video | Google Veo 3.1 Fast |
|---|---|---|
| Consistency over timeWhether details hold together over time. | Pika 2.2 Text & Image to Video5.4/10 | Google Veo 3.1 Fast7.0/10 |
| Readable textHow readable generated text and interfaces are. | Pika 2.2 Text & Image to Video5.0/10 | Google Veo 3.1 Fast6.5/10 |
| Multi-shot continuityContinuity between different shots. | Pika 2.2 Text & Image to Video4.0/10 | Google Veo 3.1 Fast7.5/10 |
| Speed & reliabilityGeneration speed and reliability. | Pika 2.2 Text & Image to Video7.5/10 | Google Veo 3.1 Fast9.1/10 |
Generate with
Pika 2.2 Text & Image to Video
Generate with
Google Veo 3.1 Fast
What will your video cost?
Compare prices by resolution. The final quote depends on your duration, mode and settings.
Pika 2.2 Text & Image to Video
- Current price unavailable
The current quote could not be confirmed. Check your settings in the app before generating.
Google Veo 3.1 Fast
- Current price unavailable
The current quote could not be confirmed. Check your settings in the app before generating.
Your settings. Your quote. Before you generate.
USD estimate · snapshot generated
Formats, inputs and controls
Check duration, resolution, supported inputs and controls. Open each model’s guide for its full feature set.
New clip · maximum
- Pika 2.2 Text & Image to Video
- 10 s
- Google Veo 3.1 Fast
- 8 s
Max resolution
- Pika 2.2 Text & Image to Video
- 1080p
- Google Veo 3.1 Fast
- 4K
Audio output
- Pika 2.2 Text & Image to Video
- Not supported
- Google Veo 3.1 Fast
- Supported
Compare all 18 specificationsClose the full specification tableCheck references, audio, camera controls and output formats.
| Key spec | Pika 2.2 Text & Image to Video | Google Veo 3.1 Fast |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing (MaxVideoAI) | Current price unavailable | Current price unavailable |
| Text-to-Video | Supported | Supported |
| Image-to-Video | Related image-start workflow | Supported |
| Video-to-Video | Not supported | Supported (extend / retake workflows) |
| First/Last frame | Not supported | Supported |
| Reference image / style reference | Single still only; no reference-style stack | Image-to-Video: 1 start image; Reference mode: 1-3 stills |
| Reference video | Not supported | Supported (source clip for extend / retake) |
| Max resolution | 1080p | 4K |
| New clip · maximum | 10 sText to video, Image to video: 5 / 10 s | 8 sText to video, Image to video, First / last frame: 4 / 6 / 8 sImage references: 8 s |
| Extension · added duration | Not supported | 7 s |
| Aspect ratios | 1:1 / 16:9 / 9:16 / 4:5 / 5:4 / 3:2 / 2:3 | 16:9 / 9:16 |
| FPS options | 24 | 24 fps |
| Output format | MP4 | MP4 |
| Audio output | Not supported | Supported |
| Native audio generation | Not supported | Supported |
| Lip sync | Not supported | Supported |
| Camera / motion controls | Basic | Prompt-based only |
| Watermark | No (MaxVideoAI) | No (MaxVideoAI) |
Duration choices depend on mode and resolution; check the creation settings.
Capabilities available in MaxVideoAI. Provider sources below; their verification dates are not recorded here.
Pika 2.2 Text & Image to Video: maxvideoai.com (1) · maxvideoai.com (2) · helpx.adobe.com · pika.art
Google Veo 3.1 Fast: maxvideoai.com · fal.ai (1) · fal.ai (2) · fal.ai (3) · fal.ai (4) · fal.ai (5)
11 questions to help you choose
FAQ
Quick answers about Pika 2.2 Text & Image to Video vs Google Veo 3.1 Fast on MaxVideoAI (pricing, modes, specs, and why results differ).
Open a question to read the answer. One answer at a time.
Which is better: Pika 2.2 Text & Image to Video or Google Veo 3.1 Fast?
It depends on your workflow. Use the scorecard and specs to compare control, references, audio, pricing, and generation limits, then open each engine profile for full details.
Which is cheaper on MaxVideoAI?
- Pika 2.2 Text & Image to Video — Current quote unavailable; check settings before generating..
- Google Veo 3.1 Fast — Current quote unavailable; check settings before generating..
- Compare equivalent settings. These are estimates in USD, not reserved quotes.
What are the biggest differences between Pika 2.2 Text & Image to Video and Google Veo 3.1 Fast?
- Reference image / style reference — Pika 2.2 Text & Image to Video: Single still only; no reference-style stack; Google Veo 3.1 Fast: Image-to-Video: 1 start image; Reference mode: 1-3 stills.
- Max resolution: Pika 2.2 Text & Image to Video is 1080p vs Google Veo 3.1 Fast is 4K.
Can I start from text, an image or a video?
- Pika 2.2 Text & Image to Video — Text-to-Video: Supported; Image-to-Video: Related image-start workflow; Video-to-Video: Not supported.
- Google Veo 3.1 Fast — Text-to-Video: Supported; Image-to-Video: Supported; Video-to-Video: Supported (extend / retake workflows).
Can I use start and end frames or references?
- Pika 2.2 Text & Image to Video — First/Last frame: Not supported; Reference image / style reference: Single still only; no reference-style stack; Reference video: Not supported.
- Google Veo 3.1 Fast — First/Last frame: Supported; Reference image / style reference: Image-to-Video: 1 start image; Reference mode: 1-3 stills; Reference video: Supported (source clip for extend / retake).
What resolutions, durations and aspect ratios are available?
- Pika 2.2 Text & Image to Video — Max resolution: 1080p; New clip · maximum: 10 s. Text to video, Image to video: 5 / 10 s. Extension · added duration: Not supported. Aspect ratios: 1:1 / 16:9 / 9:16 / 4:5 / 5:4 / 3:2 / 2:3. Duration choices depend on mode and resolution; check the creation settings.
- Google Veo 3.1 Fast — Max resolution: 4K; New clip · maximum: 8 s. Text to video, Image to video, First / last frame: 4 / 6 / 8 s; Image references: 8 s. Extension · added duration: 7 s. Aspect ratios: 16:9 / 9:16. Duration choices depend on mode and resolution; check the creation settings.
Can the models generate audio and lip sync?
- Pika 2.2 Text & Image to Video — Audio output: Not supported; Native audio generation: Not supported; Lip sync: Not supported.
- Google Veo 3.1 Fast — Audio output: Supported; Native audio generation: Supported; Lip sync: Supported.
Does MaxVideoAI add a watermark?
- Pika 2.2 Text & Image to Video — Watermark: No (MaxVideoAI).
- Google Veo 3.1 Fast — Watermark: No (MaxVideoAI).
Why can results differ between these models?
Models interpret instructions, visual references, and generation constraints differently.
Where can I find full specs, controls, and more prompt examples?
Open the full engine profiles for complete specs, controls, and more prompts: /models/pika-text-to-video and /models/veo-3-1-fast. You can also browse more outputs in the engine galleries.
What are Pika 2.2 Text & Image to Video and Google Veo 3.1 Fast?
Pika 2.2 Text & Image to Video and Google Veo 3.1 Fast are AI video generation engines documented on MaxVideoAI. This page compares key specs, pricing, controls, and performance data shown above.