Luma Ray 2 Flash
6.0/10Editorial score
Higher-rated areas: Speed & reliability, Visual quality
Compare engines
Luma Ray 2 Flash vs Google Veo 3.1 Fast
See what each model can create. Compare quality, controls and price.
How to choose
Compare Luma Ray 2 Flash and Google Veo 3.1 Fast by key specs, pricing, controls, and a scorecard across 10 criteria.
Google Veo 3.1 Fast
7.6/10Editorial score
Higher-rated areas: Speed & reliability, Audio & lip sync
See the models in action
Independent examples, with different prompts and settings.
Luma Ray 2 Flash
No published video for this model yet. Explore the available examples.
Explore examplesGoogle Veo 3.1 Fast
No published video for this model yet. Explore the available examples.
Explore examplesCompare what matters
These are MaxVideoAI editorial assessments, not same-prompt test results. The dates below record score updates. MaxVideoAI sells access to the models it covers.
Score records last updated: Luma Ray 2 Flash · Google Veo 3.1 Fast
How we benchmark| Criterion · 0–10 | Luma Ray 2 Flash | Google Veo 3.1 Fast |
|---|---|---|
| Follows your promptHow closely the result follows the prompt. | Luma Ray 2 Flash6.4/10 | Google Veo 3.1 Fast8.1/10 |
| Visual qualityDetail, lighting and visible artifacts. | Luma Ray 2 Flash7.5/10 | Google Veo 3.1 Fast7.1/10 |
| Natural movementHow naturally subjects and cameras move. | Luma Ray 2 Flash6.3/10 | Google Veo 3.1 Fast7.7/10 |
| Human appearanceFaces, hands and body movement. | Luma Ray 2 Flash7.0/10 | Google Veo 3.1 Fast7.6/10 |
| Audio & lip syncSpeech, sound and mouth movement in sync. | Luma Ray 2 FlashN/A | Google Veo 3.1 Fast8.4/10 |
| Creative controlHow much direction the model follows. | Luma Ray 2 Flash7.2/10 | Google Veo 3.1 Fast7.9/10 |
6 of 10 criteria shown10 of 10 criteria shownCompare the 4 other criteriaHide additional criteria
| Criterion · 0–10 | Luma Ray 2 Flash | Google Veo 3.1 Fast |
|---|---|---|
| Consistency over timeWhether details hold together over time. | Luma Ray 2 Flash5.4/10 | Google Veo 3.1 Fast7.0/10 |
| Readable textHow readable generated text and interfaces are. | Luma Ray 2 Flash5.6/10 | Google Veo 3.1 Fast6.5/10 |
| Multi-shot continuityContinuity between different shots. | Luma Ray 2 Flash5.4/10 | Google Veo 3.1 Fast7.5/10 |
| Speed & reliabilityGeneration speed and reliability. | Luma Ray 2 Flash8.5/10 | Google Veo 3.1 Fast9.1/10 |
Generate with
Luma Ray 2 Flash
Generate with
Google Veo 3.1 Fast
What will your video cost?
Compare prices by resolution. The final quote depends on your duration, mode and settings.
Luma Ray 2 Flash
Text to video5 s16:9audio off
- 540p
- $0.24per video · $0.048/s
- 720p
- $0.48per video · $0.096/s
- 1080p
- $0.96per video · $0.192/s
Google Veo 3.1 Fast
Text to video4 s16:9audio on
- 720p
- $0.48per video · $0.12/s
- 1080p
- $0.58per video · $0.145/s
- 4K
- $1.44per video · $0.36/s
Your settings. Your quote. Before you generate.
USD estimate · snapshot generated
Formats, inputs and controls
Check duration, resolution, supported inputs and controls. Open each model’s guide for its full feature set.
New clip · maximum
- Luma Ray 2 Flash
- 9 s
- Google Veo 3.1 Fast
- 8 s
Max resolution
- Luma Ray 2 Flash
- 1080p
- Google Veo 3.1 Fast
- 4K
Audio output
- Luma Ray 2 Flash
- Not supported
- Google Veo 3.1 Fast
- Supported
Compare all 18 specificationsClose the full specification tableCheck references, audio, camera controls and output formats.
| Key spec | Luma Ray 2 Flash | Google Veo 3.1 Fast |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing (MaxVideoAI) | 540p: $0.048/s720p: $0.096/s1080p: $0.192/s | 720p: $0.12/s1080p: $0.145/s4K: $0.36/s |
| Text-to-Video | Supported | Supported |
| Image-to-Video | Supported | Supported |
| Video-to-Video | Supported (modify / reframe workflows) | Supported (extend / retake workflows) |
| First/Last frame | Not supported | Supported |
| Reference image / style reference | Supported (single start image) | Image-to-Video: 1 start image; Reference mode: 1-3 stills |
| Reference video | Supported (source clip for modify / reframe) | Supported (source clip for extend / retake) |
| Max resolution | 1080p | 4K |
| New clip · maximum | 9 sText to video, Image to video: 5 / 9 s | 8 sText to video, Image to video, First / last frame: 4 / 6 / 8 sImage references: 8 s |
| Extension · added duration | Not supported | 7 s |
| Aspect ratios | 16:9 / 9:16 / 1:1 / 4:3 / 3:4 / 21:9 / 9:21 | 16:9 / 9:16 |
| FPS options | 24 | 24 fps |
| Output format | Data pending | MP4 |
| Audio output | Not supported | Supported |
| Native audio generation | Not supported | Supported |
| Lip sync | Data pending | Supported |
| Camera / motion controls | Not supported | Prompt-based only |
| Watermark | No (MaxVideoAI) | No (MaxVideoAI) |
Duration choices depend on mode and resolution; check the creation settings.
Capabilities available in MaxVideoAI. Provider sources below; their verification dates are not recorded here.
Luma Ray 2 Flash:
Google Veo 3.1 Fast: maxvideoai.com · fal.ai (1) · fal.ai (2) · fal.ai (3) · fal.ai (4) · fal.ai (5)
11 questions to help you choose
FAQ
Quick answers about Luma Ray 2 Flash vs Google Veo 3.1 Fast on MaxVideoAI (pricing, modes, specs, and why results differ).
Open a question to read the answer. One answer at a time.
Which is better: Luma Ray 2 Flash or Google Veo 3.1 Fast?
It depends on your workflow. Use the scorecard and specs to compare control, references, audio, pricing, and generation limits, then open each engine profile for full details.
Which is cheaper on MaxVideoAI?
- Luma Ray 2 Flash — Text to video · 5 s · 16:9 · audio off; 540p: $0.24 per video ($0.048/s); 720p: $0.48 per video ($0.096/s); 1080p: $0.96 per video ($0.192/s).
- Google Veo 3.1 Fast — Text to video · 4 s · 16:9 · audio on; 720p: $0.48 per video ($0.12/s); 1080p: $0.58 per video ($0.145/s); 4K: $1.44 per video ($0.36/s).
- Compare equivalent settings. These are estimates in USD, not reserved quotes.
What are the biggest differences between Luma Ray 2 Flash and Google Veo 3.1 Fast?
- Reference image / style reference — Luma Ray 2 Flash: supported (single start image); Google Veo 3.1 Fast: Image-to-Video: 1 start image; Reference mode: 1-3 stills.
- Max resolution: Luma Ray 2 Flash is 1080p vs Google Veo 3.1 Fast is 4K.
Can I start from text, an image or a video?
- Luma Ray 2 Flash — Text-to-Video: Supported; Image-to-Video: Supported; Video-to-Video: Supported (modify / reframe workflows).
- Google Veo 3.1 Fast — Text-to-Video: Supported; Image-to-Video: Supported; Video-to-Video: Supported (extend / retake workflows).
Can I use start and end frames or references?
- Luma Ray 2 Flash — First/Last frame: Not supported; Reference image / style reference: Supported (single start image); Reference video: Supported (source clip for modify / reframe).
- Google Veo 3.1 Fast — First/Last frame: Supported; Reference image / style reference: Image-to-Video: 1 start image; Reference mode: 1-3 stills; Reference video: Supported (source clip for extend / retake).
What resolutions, durations and aspect ratios are available?
- Luma Ray 2 Flash — Max resolution: 1080p; New clip · maximum: 9 s. Text to video, Image to video: 5 / 9 s. Extension · added duration: Not supported. Aspect ratios: 16:9 / 9:16 / 1:1 / 4:3 / 3:4 / 21:9 / 9:21. Duration choices depend on mode and resolution; check the creation settings.
- Google Veo 3.1 Fast — Max resolution: 4K; New clip · maximum: 8 s. Text to video, Image to video, First / last frame: 4 / 6 / 8 s; Image references: 8 s. Extension · added duration: 7 s. Aspect ratios: 16:9 / 9:16. Duration choices depend on mode and resolution; check the creation settings.
Can the models generate audio and lip sync?
- Luma Ray 2 Flash — Audio output: Not supported; Native audio generation: Not supported; Lip sync: still being validated.
- Google Veo 3.1 Fast — Audio output: Supported; Native audio generation: Supported; Lip sync: Supported.
Does MaxVideoAI add a watermark?
- Luma Ray 2 Flash — Watermark: No (MaxVideoAI).
- Google Veo 3.1 Fast — Watermark: No (MaxVideoAI).
Why can results differ between these models?
Models interpret instructions, visual references, and generation constraints differently.
Where can I find full specs, controls, and more prompt examples?
Open the full engine profiles for complete specs, controls, and more prompts: /models/luma-ray-2-flash and /models/veo-3-1-fast. You can also browse more outputs in the engine galleries.
What are Luma Ray 2 Flash and Google Veo 3.1 Fast?
Luma Ray 2 Flash and Google Veo 3.1 Fast are AI video generation engines documented on MaxVideoAI. This page compares key specs, pricing, controls, and performance data shown above.