Compare engines

LTX 2.3 Fast vs Luma Ray 2

See what each model can create. Compare quality, controls and price.

How to choose

Compare LTX 2.3 Fast with Luma Ray 2 when choosing between fast, audio-ready generation and a legacy Luma editing toolkit. LTX 2.3 Fast reaches 20 seconds with 1080p, 1440p, or 4K output, while Luma Ray 2 stays at 9 seconds but adds video-to-video and reframe workflows.

Quick verdict

Choose LTX 2.3 Fast for rapid text or image generation, native audio, longer landscape or vertical clips, and output up to 4K. Choose Luma Ray 2 when an existing clip needs video-to-video transformation or reframing across a broader set of aspect ratios and 1080p is enough.

Choose LTX 2.3 Fast

Use LTX for fast concepts, audio-ready output, clips up to 20 seconds, and 1080p through 4K delivery.

Choose Luma Ray 2

Use the legacy Luma route to modify an existing video or reframe footage for wide, square, vertical, and ultrawide formats.

Key trade-off

LTX offers more duration, resolution, and audio; Luma offers source-video transformation and more aspect-ratio choices.

Best workflows

LTX fits fast campaign drafts and high-resolution generation. Luma fits repurposing, format adaptation, and legacy edit workflows.

LTX 2.3 Fast

6.7/10Editorial score

Higher-rated areas: Speed & reliability, Audio & lip sync

Luma Ray 2

6.7/10Editorial score

Higher-rated areas: Visual quality, Creative control

Compare what matters

These are MaxVideoAI editorial assessments, not same-prompt test results. The dates below record score updates. MaxVideoAI sells access to the models it covers.

Score records last updated: LTX 2.3 Fast · Luma Ray 2

How we benchmark
Criterion · 0–10LTX 2.3 FastLuma Ray 2
Follows your promptHow closely the result follows the prompt.
LTX 2.3 Fast7.1/10
Luma Ray 27.1/10
Visual qualityDetail, lighting and visible artifacts.
LTX 2.3 Fast6.9/10
Luma Ray 28.3/10
Natural movementHow naturally subjects and cameras move.
LTX 2.3 Fast7.2/10
Luma Ray 26.9/10
Human appearanceFaces, hands and body movement.
LTX 2.3 Fast7.0/10
Luma Ray 27.4/10
Audio & lip syncSpeech, sound and mouth movement in sync.
LTX 2.3 Fast7.3/10
Luma Ray 2N/A
Creative controlHow much direction the model follows.
LTX 2.3 Fast7.1/10
Luma Ray 27.8/10
6 of 10 criteria shown10 of 10 criteria shownCompare the 4 other criteriaHide additional criteria
Criterion · 0–10LTX 2.3 FastLuma Ray 2
Consistency over timeWhether details hold together over time.
LTX 2.3 Fast5.9/10
Luma Ray 26.1/10
Readable textHow readable generated text and interfaces are.
LTX 2.3 Fast6.2/10
Luma Ray 25.8/10
Multi-shot continuityContinuity between different shots.
LTX 2.3 Fast6.0/10
Luma Ray 25.8/10
Speed & reliabilityGeneration speed and reliability.
LTX 2.3 Fast9.0/10
Luma Ray 26.8/10

What will your video cost?

Compare prices by resolution. The final quote depends on your duration, mode and settings.

LTX 2.3 Fast

Current price unavailable

The current quote could not be confirmed. Check your settings in the app before generating.

Luma Ray 2

Current price unavailable

The current quote could not be confirmed. Check your settings in the app before generating.

Your settings. Your quote. Before you generate.
USD estimate · snapshot generated

Formats, inputs and controls

Check duration, resolution, supported inputs and controls. Open each model’s guide for its full feature set.

New clip · maximum

LTX 2.3 Fast
20 s
Luma Ray 2
9 s

Max resolution

LTX 2.3 Fast
4K (6–10s); 1080p for >10s routing
Luma Ray 2
1080p

Audio output

LTX 2.3 Fast
Supported
Luma Ray 2
Not supported
Compare all 17 specificationsClose the full specification tableCheck references, audio, camera controls and output formats.
LTX 2.3 Fast / Luma Ray 2 — Key spec
Key specLTX 2.3 FastLuma Ray 2
Pricing (MaxVideoAI)Current price unavailableCurrent price unavailable
Text-to-VideoSupportedSupported
Image-to-VideoSupportedSupported
Video-to-VideoNot supportedSupported (modify / reframe workflows)
First/Last frameSupported (start + end image in I2V)Not supported
Reference image / style referenceSupported (single start image; no separate style-reference stack)Supported (single start image)
Reference videoNot supportedSupported (source clip for modify / reframe)
Max resolution4K (6–10s); 1080p for >10s routing1080p
New clip · maximum20 sText to video, Image to video: 6 / 8 / 10 / 12 / 14 / 16 / 18 / 20 s9 sText to video, Image to video: 5 / 9 s
Aspect ratios16:9 / 9:1616:9 / 9:16 / 1:1 / 4:3 / 3:4 / 21:9 / 9:21
FPS options24 fps / 25 fps / 48 fps / 50 fps24
Output formatMP4Data pending
Audio outputSupportedNot supported
Native audio generationSupportedNot supported
Lip syncSupportedData pending
Camera / motion controlsPrompt-based onlyNot supported
WatermarkNo (MaxVideoAI)No (MaxVideoAI)

Duration choices depend on mode and resolution; check the creation settings.

Capabilities available in MaxVideoAI. Provider sources below; their verification dates are not recorded here.

LTX 2.3 Fast: fal.ai (1) · fal.ai (2) · fal.ai (3)

Luma Ray 2:

Recommended next steps

Continue this comparison in your AI assistant
3 questions to help you choose

FAQ

Short answers for choosing between LTX 2.3 Fast generation and Luma Ray 2 editing.

Open a question to read the answer. One answer at a time.

Which model is better for fast 4K AI video?

LTX 2.3 Fast is the clear fit because it supports 4K output, native audio, and clips up to 20 seconds. Luma Ray 2 tops out at 1080p and does not generate audio.

What can Luma Ray 2 do that LTX 2.3 Fast cannot?

Luma Ray 2 includes video-to-video and reframe modes for transforming or resizing existing footage. LTX 2.3 Fast focuses on text-to-video and image-to-video generation.

Should I still choose the legacy Luma Ray 2 route?

Choose it when source-video modification or broad aspect-ratio reframing is the main job. For new audio-ready generation, longer clips, or high-resolution output, use LTX 2.3 Fast.