Kling 2.6 Pro
7.9/10Editorial score
Higher-rated areas: Follows your prompt, Audio & lip sync
Compare engines
Kling 2.6 Pro vs Google Veo 3.1 Fast
See what each model can create. Compare quality, controls and price.
How to choose
Compare Kling 2.6 Pro and Google Veo 3.1 Fast by key specs, pricing, controls, and a scorecard across 10 criteria.
Google Veo 3.1 Fast
7.6/10Editorial score
Higher-rated areas: Speed & reliability, Audio & lip sync
See the models in action
Independent examples, with different prompts and settings.
Kling 2.6 Pro
No published video for this model yet. Explore the available examples.
Explore examplesGoogle Veo 3.1 Fast
No published video for this model yet. Explore the available examples.
Explore examplesCompare what matters
These are MaxVideoAI editorial assessments, not same-prompt test results. The dates below record score updates. MaxVideoAI sells access to the models it covers.
Score records last updated: Kling 2.6 Pro · Google Veo 3.1 Fast
How we benchmark| Criterion · 0–10 | Kling 2.6 Pro | Google Veo 3.1 Fast |
|---|---|---|
| Follows your promptHow closely the result follows the prompt. | Kling 2.6 Pro8.3/10 | Google Veo 3.1 Fast8.1/10 |
| Visual qualityDetail, lighting and visible artifacts. | Kling 2.6 Pro7.9/10 | Google Veo 3.1 Fast7.1/10 |
| Natural movementHow naturally subjects and cameras move. | Kling 2.6 Pro8.1/10 | Google Veo 3.1 Fast7.7/10 |
| Human appearanceFaces, hands and body movement. | Kling 2.6 Pro7.7/10 | Google Veo 3.1 Fast7.6/10 |
| Audio & lip syncSpeech, sound and mouth movement in sync. | Kling 2.6 Pro8.2/10 | Google Veo 3.1 Fast8.4/10 |
| Creative controlHow much direction the model follows. | Kling 2.6 Pro8.0/10 | Google Veo 3.1 Fast7.9/10 |
6 of 10 criteria shown10 of 10 criteria shownCompare the 4 other criteriaHide additional criteria
| Criterion · 0–10 | Kling 2.6 Pro | Google Veo 3.1 Fast |
|---|---|---|
| Consistency over timeWhether details hold together over time. | Kling 2.6 Pro7.3/10 | Google Veo 3.1 Fast7.0/10 |
| Readable textHow readable generated text and interfaces are. | Kling 2.6 Pro6.5/10 | Google Veo 3.1 Fast6.5/10 |
| Multi-shot continuityContinuity between different shots. | Kling 2.6 Pro6.5/10 | Google Veo 3.1 Fast7.5/10 |
| Speed & reliabilityGeneration speed and reliability. | Kling 2.6 Pro6.8/10 | Google Veo 3.1 Fast9.1/10 |
Generate with
Kling 2.6 Pro
Generate with
Google Veo 3.1 Fast
What will your video cost?
Compare prices by resolution. The final quote depends on your duration, mode and settings.
Kling 2.6 Pro
Text to video5 s16:9audio on
- 1080p
- $0.84per video · $0.168/s
Google Veo 3.1 Fast
Text to video4 s16:9audio on
- 720p
- $0.48per video · $0.12/s
- 1080p
- $0.58per video · $0.145/s
- 4K
- $1.44per video · $0.36/s
Your settings. Your quote. Before you generate.
USD estimate · snapshot generated
Formats, inputs and controls
Check duration, resolution, supported inputs and controls. Open each model’s guide for its full feature set.
New clip · maximum
- Kling 2.6 Pro
- 10 s
- Google Veo 3.1 Fast
- 8 s
Max resolution
- Kling 2.6 Pro
- 1080p
- Google Veo 3.1 Fast
- 4K
Audio output
- Kling 2.6 Pro
- Supported
- Google Veo 3.1 Fast
- Supported
Compare all 18 specificationsClose the full specification tableCheck references, audio, camera controls and output formats.
| Key spec | Kling 2.6 Pro | Google Veo 3.1 Fast |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing (MaxVideoAI) | 1080p: $0.168/s | 720p: $0.12/s1080p: $0.145/s4K: $0.36/s |
| Text-to-Video | Supported | Supported |
| Image-to-Video | Supported | Supported |
| Video-to-Video | Not supported | Supported (extend / retake workflows) |
| First/Last frame | Supported (start image + optional end image) | Supported |
| Reference image / style reference | Supported | Image-to-Video: 1 start image; Reference mode: 1-3 stills |
| Reference video | Not supported | Supported (source clip for extend / retake) |
| Max resolution | 1080p | 4K |
| New clip · maximum | 10 sText to video, Image to video: 5 / 10 s | 8 sText to video, Image to video, First / last frame: 4 / 6 / 8 sImage references: 8 s |
| Extension · added duration | Not supported | 7 s |
| Aspect ratios | 16:9 / 9:16 / 1:1 | 16:9 / 9:16 |
| FPS options | 24 | 24 fps |
| Output format | MP4 | MP4 |
| Audio output | Supported | Supported |
| Native audio generation | Supported | Supported |
| Lip sync | Supported | Supported |
| Camera / motion controls | Advanced | Prompt-based only |
| Watermark | No (MaxVideoAI) | No (MaxVideoAI) |
Duration choices depend on mode and resolution; check the creation settings.
Capabilities available in MaxVideoAI. Provider sources below; their verification dates are not recorded here.
Kling 2.6 Pro: maxvideoai.com · fal.ai · replicate.com
Google Veo 3.1 Fast: maxvideoai.com · fal.ai (1) · fal.ai (2) · fal.ai (3) · fal.ai (4) · fal.ai (5)
11 questions to help you choose
FAQ
Quick answers about Kling 2.6 Pro vs Google Veo 3.1 Fast on MaxVideoAI (pricing, modes, specs, and why results differ).
Open a question to read the answer. One answer at a time.
Which is better: Kling 2.6 Pro or Google Veo 3.1 Fast?
It depends on your workflow. Use the scorecard and specs to compare control, references, audio, pricing, and generation limits, then open each engine profile for full details.
Which is cheaper on MaxVideoAI?
- Kling 2.6 Pro — Text to video · 5 s · 16:9 · audio on; 1080p: $0.84 per video ($0.168/s).
- Google Veo 3.1 Fast — Text to video · 4 s · 16:9 · audio on; 720p: $0.48 per video ($0.12/s); 1080p: $0.58 per video ($0.145/s); 4K: $1.44 per video ($0.36/s).
- Compare equivalent settings. These are estimates in USD, not reserved quotes.
What are the biggest differences between Kling 2.6 Pro and Google Veo 3.1 Fast?
- Reference image / style reference — Kling 2.6 Pro: supported; Google Veo 3.1 Fast: Image-to-Video: 1 start image; Reference mode: 1-3 stills.
- Max resolution: Kling 2.6 Pro is 1080p vs Google Veo 3.1 Fast is 4K.
Can I start from text, an image or a video?
- Kling 2.6 Pro — Text-to-Video: Supported; Image-to-Video: Supported; Video-to-Video: Not supported.
- Google Veo 3.1 Fast — Text-to-Video: Supported; Image-to-Video: Supported; Video-to-Video: Supported (extend / retake workflows).
Can I use start and end frames or references?
- Kling 2.6 Pro — First/Last frame: Supported (start image + optional end image); Reference image / style reference: Supported; Reference video: Not supported.
- Google Veo 3.1 Fast — First/Last frame: Supported; Reference image / style reference: Image-to-Video: 1 start image; Reference mode: 1-3 stills; Reference video: Supported (source clip for extend / retake).
What resolutions, durations and aspect ratios are available?
- Kling 2.6 Pro — Max resolution: 1080p; New clip · maximum: 10 s. Text to video, Image to video: 5 / 10 s. Extension · added duration: Not supported. Aspect ratios: 16:9 / 9:16 / 1:1. Duration choices depend on mode and resolution; check the creation settings.
- Google Veo 3.1 Fast — Max resolution: 4K; New clip · maximum: 8 s. Text to video, Image to video, First / last frame: 4 / 6 / 8 s; Image references: 8 s. Extension · added duration: 7 s. Aspect ratios: 16:9 / 9:16. Duration choices depend on mode and resolution; check the creation settings.
Can the models generate audio and lip sync?
- Kling 2.6 Pro — Audio output: Supported; Native audio generation: Supported; Lip sync: Supported.
- Google Veo 3.1 Fast — Audio output: Supported; Native audio generation: Supported; Lip sync: Supported.
Does MaxVideoAI add a watermark?
- Kling 2.6 Pro — Watermark: No (MaxVideoAI).
- Google Veo 3.1 Fast — Watermark: No (MaxVideoAI).
Why can results differ between these models?
Models interpret instructions, visual references, and generation constraints differently.
Where can I find full specs, controls, and more prompt examples?
Open the full engine profiles for complete specs, controls, and more prompts: /models/kling-2-6-pro and /models/veo-3-1-fast. You can also browse more outputs in the engine galleries.
What are Kling 2.6 Pro and Google Veo 3.1 Fast?
Kling 2.6 Pro and Google Veo 3.1 Fast are AI video generation engines documented on MaxVideoAI. This page compares key specs, pricing, controls, and performance data shown above.